|
Post by ruffryder on Oct 16, 2004 11:27:23 GMT -5
I have both games too. In espn everything seems way more fluid, but Live just seems more fun. The commentary in ESPN sucks bad, Bill Walton talks like once every 5 minutes, usually only on replays. Sometimes I forget he's there. Anyway it gets kind of repetitive. Live's booth is the best, no doubt. The highlights etc in ESPN are good, but you can tell that they're throwing in all of this extra stuff trying to cover up other bad areas and faults in their game.
Also take notice of how much better Live's cyberfaces are this year. They look pretty spot on, really close to ESPN's. Now all they need to do is tweak their player models abit. Also I may mess around with the playermodels on pc when Live comes out, if I can figure out how to work O-edit good enough.
|
|
|
Post by Mojangles on Oct 19, 2004 1:43:43 GMT -5
I have both games too. In espn everything seems way more fluid, but Live just seems more fun. The commentary in ESPN sucks bad, Bill Walton talks like once every 5 minutes, usually only on replays. Sometimes I forget he's there. Anyway it gets kind of repetitive. Live's booth is the best, no doubt. The highlights etc in ESPN are good, but you can tell that they're throwing in all of this extra stuff trying to cover up other bad areas and faults in their game. Also take notice of how much better Live's cyberfaces are this year. They look pretty spot on, really close to ESPN's. Now all they need to do is tweak their player models abit. Also I may mess around with the playermodels on pc when Live comes out, if I can figure out how to work O-edit good enough. hmm I have the same opinion on Live as u do...Live is super fun....I'll see bout ESPN later...
|
|